Jill wrote:I understand that a lot of you probably didn't respect my game but that's because it didn't benefit any of yours.
Ted wrote:You're the Telstra of partners.
Ted wrote:It's not about throwing your entire game down the drain for your partner, it's about keeping your own partner around long enough to get the talisman for yourself and then cutting your partner's throat at the next opportunity. That kind of success is a great argument at FTC - which is why my vote will probably go to either Ken or Tyrone if either make it to the end.
Chase wrote:alol Ted <3
Idk if it is as simple as that though. Like yeah we were disconnected from each other the entire game and clearly you didn't need me to make that move on Holly. The only problem I had was that socially you didn't seem to want to bother with me at all I knew both you and Holly for the shortest amount of time, but she was someone I would have gladly voted for at the end and you were not because she understood the social aspect as well as playing a solid strategic game.
Mia Galeotalanza wrote:I agree with Brenda. And honestly if it was me, I would have cut my partner loose pretty quick too, especially if they were on another tribe or in another alliance.
Holly wrote:So Ted, if Jolanda and I were the final partners and not Ken/Tyrone, would you be saying the same thing about almost assuring your jury vote at the finals?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest